Religious bitches whinning for veil and abaya

Dutch Have Reached a New Level of Authoritarianism
Naima Bouteldja, The Guardian
Source: ArabNews

AMSTERDAM, 22 November 2006 — The political hubbub that greeted Jack Straw’s comments on the veil seems to have inspired a new continental fashion. Latest to join the fray is the Dutch government, which in the run-up to the general election announced plans to ban the wearing of the burqa and face veil in public. By doing so, it has raised what is becoming a Europe-wide campaign to a new level of authoritarianism. Naima Azough, a Dutch Green MP, points out that the ban would apply to fewer than 100 women. “This didn’t come from public pressure,” she says, “but was initiated by the immigration minister, Rita Verdonk, whose Liberal-Conservative party is scrambling for far-right votes.” The result will simply reinforce the perception of Muslims that they will never be accepted in Dutch society.

Of course, the dress code of Muslim women was making headlines across Europe long before Straw weighed in. The wearing of the headscarf by teachers is already forbidden in schools in several German states. In Belgium, the minister-president of the Walloon-Brussels region last year authorized state schools to ban the headscarf. The result has been the creation of ghettoized schools.

In each European country, veil mania seems to follow a similar pattern: A public statement by a prominent politician results in a frenzied political and media response, conveniently diverting attention away from unpopular government policies or political crises.
France provided the political laboratory. In April 2003, the headscarf row came out of nowhere; within a year it had been outlawed in state schools. No serious demands to ban the headscarf had ever come from teaching bodies, students or the public. It simply wasn’t seen as a problem before April 2003: Of the 10 million students in French state schools, only 1,250 wore the headscarf.

So who or what sparked “l’affaire du foulard”? Françoise Lorcerie, the editor of “The Politicization of the Veil in France, Europe and the Arab World,” points the finger at France’s interior minister, Nicolas Sarkozy, who, in a generally well-received speech to the Union of French Muslim Organizations in April 2003, sparked uproar in the hall when he reminded the audience that wearing the headscarf on national ID card photos was “unlawful”.

Responding to a climate of his government’s own making, President Chirac set up the powerful Stasi commission, named after its Catholic chair, to investigate “how secularism could be enforced in the republic”. MPs of all parties kept up the pressure, introducing parliamentary bills to ban the headscarf. Public opinion then turned, from being almost evenly divided at the start of the campaign to 76 percent in favor of a ban within a year. Partly as a result of this extraordinary diversion, the Raffarin government was able to face down large-scale public opposition to pension reform.

For Pierre Tévanian, the author of “Le Voile Médiatique,” the headscarf “unveiled another genuine problem”, later confirmed by last November’s social explosion in the French suburbs: “An ingrained postcolonial racism that crosses all social divides and political formations, even the most progressive.” Most alarmingly, the veil and headscarf debate intertwined seamlessly with issues of law and order, women’s oppression and international terrorism.
The Dutch government’s proposed ban on both niqab and burqa in all public spaces takes things to a new and disturbing level. The implication is clear: Niqab or hijab-wearing women, and through them European Muslims, are being asked to submit not to the law of the land, but to each country’s dominant way of life.

The more governments and media foment hysteria over headscarves and niqabs, the more it seems a pan-European Islamophobic consensus is being built, as politicians search for scapegoats for social problems and pretexts to legislate in the “war on terror”.

— Naima Bouteldja, a French journalist, is a researcher for the Transnational Institute.

---

The point is, to be able to integrate in some society, you have to be one like them. I mean comeon you migrated their out of your own free will so you knews their rules and regulation were coming which must be obeyed.

And this veil and abaya movement among muslims isn't that innocent either. How many girls do actually cover because of the fear of elders and parents instead of religion???? And then you have the nasty Turks and Paki's honour killing their daughters our scarves.. Its a good thing to be banned.. no scarves no problems..The terrorist women hiding bombs in their abayas and riding trains..These are symbols of wahabism and rape away from women their self confidence and right of representation. If you are so concerned about morals and provocation then you can simply choose to dress right and now just hide under a ventilation less tent with a sneak peak for vision.

When Saudi's advertise their campaign of naturalization for the long time residents of the Kingdom, they sure put in a lot of ridiculous demand to applicats including full knowledge of all stupid cultures and moral codes prevailing in Saudi Arabia, stupid local Arabic dialects and dynasty of wahabism. So be thankful that the Germans aren't being the Saudi's and be thanful that they reward you with naturalization and human rights instead of leaving you stranded like the magic kingdom..